Appeal No. 1998-0483
Application No. 08/543,840
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 12, mailed September 16, 1997) for the complete reasoning
in support of the rejections, and to the appellant's brief
(Paper No. 11, filed July 24, 1997) and reply brief (Paper No.
13, filed November 21, 1997) for the arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellant's specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellant and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follow.
The 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, rejection.
We cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of appellant's
claims 1 through 6 and 12 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007