Ex parte BRIGHT - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-0483                                                        
          Application No. 08/543,840                                                  




          rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper               
          No. 12, mailed September 16, 1997) for the complete reasoning               
          in support of the rejections, and to the appellant's brief                  
          (Paper No. 11, filed July 24, 1997) and reply brief (Paper No.              
          13, filed November 21, 1997) for the arguments thereagainst.                





                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                 
          careful consideration to the appellant's specification and                  
          claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the                     
          respective positions articulated by the appellant and the                   
          examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                      
          determinations which follow.                                                


          The 35 U.S.C.  112, second paragraph, rejection.                           
               We cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of appellant's              
          claims 1 through 6 and 12 through 18 under 35 U.S.C.  112.                 

                                          5                                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007