Ex parte DEWEY - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 19           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      

                               Ex parte CRAIG D. DEWEY                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-0488                                  
                             Application No. 08/496,234                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      


          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and LALL, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.                                          








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007