THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER AHIMOVIC and NARAYAN MANEPALLY
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0498
Application No. 08/541,471
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appeal to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 3, 6-8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21,
23, 25, 26, 28-31, 33 and 35.
Representative claim 3 is reproduced below:
3. A node for a conferencing system, coupled to at least one
other node, providing computer conferencing between the nodes,
the node comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007