Ex parte GREENBAUM - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                       Paper No. 10                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                            Ex parte WILLIAM M. GREENBAUM                             
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1998-0500                                  
                               Application 08/504,478                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and GROSS, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 13-18.  Claims 1-12                 
          have been allowed by the examiner.  An amendment after final                
          rejection was filed on February 11, 1997 and was entered by                 
          the examiner.                                                               
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007