Ex parte GREENBAUM - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0500                                                        
          Application 08/504,478                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to a system for                            
          electronically verifying alignment and contact between two                  
          parts to be mated.                                                          
          Representative claim 13 is reproduced as follows:                           
               13. An active verification system for at least one of                  
          alignment, contact, and alignment and contact of mating parts,              
          comprising:                                                                 
               first and second structure means including conductive                  
          patterns for alignment/contact verification of associated                   
          mating parts; and                                                           
               an elastomeric interface adapted to be located between                 
          such associated mating parts;                                               
               whereby alignment verification is determined by a zero                 
          electric flow through said electrically conductive patterns,                
          and contact verification is determined by an electric flow                  
          through said electrically conductive patterns.                              
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Brodsky et al. (Brodsky)      5,468,917          Nov. 21, 1995              
          (filed Feb. 23,                                                             
          1994)                                                                       
          Claims 13-16 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                          
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Brodsky.                 
          Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     
          unpatentable over the teachings of Brodsky.  A rejection of                 
          claims 13-18 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112                  
          made in the final rejection was not repeated in the examiner’s              
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007