Ex parte KAWAMURA et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1998-0501                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/518,997                                                                                


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           

                     The appellants’ invention relates to a semi-transparent protective construction for                
              splice portions using semi-transparent hot melt.  An understanding of the invention can be                
              derived from a reading of exemplary claim 5, which is reproduced below.                                   
                     5.     A protective construction for spliced portions of a plurality of wires,                     
                     comprising:                                                                                        
                            an at least partially transparent cap for enclosing said portions; and                      
                            at least a portion of said cap being filled with at least partially                         
                     transparent hot melt;                                                                              
                            wherein an object placed in said hot melt is visible through said cap                       
                     and hot melt, and                                                                                  
                     wherein said object does not contact an inner periphery of said cap.                               

                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Berbeco                            4,662,514                   May 05,  1987                              
                       1                                                                                                
              Preissler                          1,433,716                   Feb. 21, 1966                              
              (France Patent Publication)                                                                               
                     Claims 5, 7-13 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                   
              over Preissler in view of Berbeco and appellants’ own disclosure at page 7.                               



                     A copy of the translation by S.T.I.C. Translation Branch, dated January 13, 1988, is attached.1                                                                                                 
                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007