THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte GHEORGHE S. STAN, and JOHANNUS L. BAKX
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-0591
Application 08/538,5171
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 12-20 and 22-
31. Claims 12 and 19 are independent claims.
References relied on by the Examiner
Syracuse Patent No. 4,750,059 June 7, 1988
The Rejections on Appeal
1
Application for patent filed October 3, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007