Appeal No. 1998-0591 Application 08/538,517 point of rotation of the disc to the scanning location, (a) the angular velocity decreases substantially, and (b) the linear velocity increases substantially. Claim 13 depends from claim 12. The examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie case of anticipation. Anticipation is established only when a single prior art reference discloses, either expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every element of the claimed invention. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 707, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657 (Fed. Cir. 1990); RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed.Cir. 1984). See also In re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 1326, 231 USPQ 136, 138 (Fed. Cir. 1986); Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1458, 221 USPQ 481, 485 (Fed. Cir. 1984). The prior art reference must either expressly or inherently describe each and every limitation in a claim. Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 827 (1987). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007