THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte ZINE-EDDINE BOUTAGHOU
__________________
Appeal No. 98-0592
Application 08/463,1681
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 13-15. Claims 1-12 and 16-
27 have been canceled. No claim has been allowed. The real
party in interest is International Business Machines
Corporation.
References relied on by the Examiner
Elliot et al. (Elliot) 5,251,082 October 5, 1993
1
Application for patent filed June 5, 1995.
According to the appellant, it is a division of application
08/321,935, filed October 12, 1994,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007