THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TERUO SATO and
YASUO TONAMI
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-0598
Application 08/278,864
______________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 23, 2000
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3 and 5 through 11. In an amendment submitted with
the Brief, claims 1 and 3 were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a magnetic reproducing
apparatus for playing back a magnetic recording medium on
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007