THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte SAMUEL W. YUAN
__________________
Appeal No. 98-0600
Application 08/541,4411
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-7. No claim has
been allowed. Claim 3 has been canceled. The real party in
interest is Read-Rite Corporation.
References relied on by the Examiner
Kira et al. (Kira) 4,639,806 January 27,
1987
The Rejections on Appeal
1
Application for patent filed October 10, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007