Ex parte HAMILTON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0613                                                        
          Application 08/554,998                                                      


               the processor adapted to send an I/O command and an                    
          address over the I/O bus;                                                   
               the I/O board adapted to receive the I/O command and the               
          address;                                                                    
               the processor configured to send a particular sequence of              
          I/O commands and addresses over the I/O bus wherein addresses               
          within the particular sequence are not all identical;                       
               the I/O board configured to compare the particular                     
          sequence of I/O commands and addresses to a predetermined                   
          sequence; and                                                               
               the I/O board configured to activate at least a portion                
          of the I/O board when the particular sequence of I/O commands               
          and addresses matches the predetermined sequence.                           
               The Examiner does not rely on any references.                          
               Claims 76 through 83 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          112, first paragraph, as containing subject matter which lacks              
          support in the specification.                                               
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the brief, reply brief and                   
          answer for the respective details thereof.                                  
                                       OPINION                                        
               It is our view, after consideration of the record before               
          us, that the disclosure in this application does comply with                
          the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112.                     
               At the outset, we note that Appellants have indicated on               
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007