THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. DAILY, MICHAEL D. HOWARD,
KEVIN R. MARTIN and ROBERT L. SELIGER
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0621
Application No. 08/323,288
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 10, all claims pending in this application.
The invention relates to a computerized information
display system. The display allows a user to view multiple
full-size data windows in a non-overlapping manner, several of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007