Ex parte DAILY et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-0621                                                        
          Application No. 08/323,288                                                  


          Importers Int’l, 73 F.3d at 1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing W.              
          L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d at 1551,                 
          1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.                                              
               As pointed out above, the record is devoid of any reason               
          to combine the references other than Appellants’ disclosure.                
          Such hindsight use of Appellants’ disclosure is impermissible.              
          Since there is no evidence in the record that the prior art                 
          suggested the desirability of such a combination, we will not               
          sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 1.                                
               The remaining claims on appeal also contain the above                  
          limitations discussed in regard to claim 1 and thereby, we                  
          will not sustain the rejection as to these claims.                          
                                                                                     














                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007