THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DANIEL E. ROSE, JEREMY J. BORNSTEIN,
KEVIN TIENE and DULCE B. PONCELEON
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0630
Application 08/231,655
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 30,
which constitute all of the claims in the application on appeal before us here.
BACKGROUND
The subject matter on appeal is directed to the field of information access in multiuser computer
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007