Ex parte ROSE et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                       

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law              
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               

                                                                                             Paper No. 21                           

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         


                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               

                                    Ex parte DANIEL E. ROSE, JEREMY J. BORNSTEIN,                                                   
                                         KEVIN TIENE and DULCE B. PONCELEON                                                         

                                                      Appeal No. 1998-0630                                                          
                                                      Application 08/231,655                                                        

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                

               Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    

               FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 30,                 

               which constitute all of the claims in the application on appeal before us here.                                      


                       The subject matter on appeal is directed to the field of information access in multiuser computer            


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007