THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KENICHI SONOBE, TOSHIFUMI NAKAMURA,
TAKASHI OKABE and TAKENORI OBARA
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0741
Application 08/194,2791
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 2-11,
all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to an image data processor. Claim
2 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed February 10, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007