THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FARID DIBACHI,
CHARLES S. RICHARDSON
and ARNOLD S. LIPPA
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0743
Application 08/214,1691
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,
5, 7-15 and 18-20, all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a hearing aid apparatus. Claim
1 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed March 16, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007