Appeal No. 1998-0750 Application 08/232,135 of a noise-related signal in an energy signal. Nevertheless, the examiner’s position at page 12 of the answer is that, Fukuoka uses a comparator to get an Vout which is equal to Vin, if a different voltage is produced (noise-related signal is detected), the Vg is inputted to the comparator until the Vout is equal to the Vin (col. 5, lines 20-40), so, the unwanted different voltages (noise-related signal or crosstalk) is not produced in the display panel. We are not persuaded by the examiner’s position. With respect to Figure 1 of Fukuoka, V would be the energy signal OUT applied to a pixel of claim 58. However, Fukuoka does not detect a noise-related signal in the energy signal and, accordingly, discloses no means for modifying the energy signal in response to detection of a noise-related signal. Although Fukuoka modifies V , it is in response to V , which is neither a noise-relatedOUT G signal nor in the energy signal. We will not sustain the rejection of dependent claims 12 and 48 as obvious over Fukuoka or of dependent claims 39-42 as obvious over Fukuoka and Kanayama. We do not agree with the examiner that the feedback line of Fukuoka is a current mirror circuit. A current mirror circuit includes at least two outputs providing output currents. Fukuoka’s feedback line has but one circuit line which could be considered as providing a current output. Furthermore, appellants disclose at page 16, lines 23 and 24, of 15Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007