Ex parte MACLEOD et al. - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law             
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                              

                                                                                            Paper No. 21                           


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        

                                                         _____________                                                             


                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              

                                                         _____________                                                             

                                                Ex parte DONALD MACLEOD,                                                           
                                         LONG VAN NGUYEN, ALIREZA RAHIMI,                                                          
                                                 and ROBERT NOTTINGHAM                                                             
                                                         _____________                                                             

                                                       Appeal No. 98-0816                                                          
                                                    Application 08/286,287                                                         
                                                        ______________                                                             

                                                    HEARD: April 20, 2000                                                          
                                                       _______________                                                             


               Before FLEMING, DIXON, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     

               FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 


                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 21,                

               23, 25 to 30, and 33 to 37, which constitute all of the pending claims in the application before us on              

                                                                1                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007