Appeal No. 98-0816
Application 08/286,287
The following references are relied on by the examiner:
Starcevic 3,988,622 Oct. 26, 1976
Hoyer-Ellefsen 4,340,830 Jul. 20, 1982
Müller et al. (Müller) 4,604,665 Aug. 5, 1986
Tatukawa et al. (Tatukawa) 4,701,654 Oct. 20, 1987
Silvaggio et al. (Silvaggio) 4,816,710 Mar. 28, 1989
Schuh 4,922,406 May 1, 1990
Hishida et al. (Hishida) 5,045,738 Sep. 3, 1991
Connors et al. (Connors) 5,091,809 Feb. 25, 1992
Girault 5,126,612 Jun. 30, 1992
Kanaya et al. (Kanaya) 5,155,401 Oct. 13, 1992
Elsasser et al. (Elsasser) 5,173,814 Dec. 22, 1992
Jabbari et al. (Jabbari) 5,177,650 Jan. 5, 1993
Frugé et al. (Frugé) 5,200,866 Apr. 6, 1993
Okada et al. (Okada) 5,245,234 Sep. 14, 1993
Cossette et al. (Cossette) 5,267,737 Dec. 7, 1993
Tanaka et al. (Tanaka) 5,319,270 Jun. 7, 1994
Kloeppel et al. (Kloeppel) 5,454,724 Oct. 3, 1995
(filed Jul. 22, 1994)
Claims 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, 26, and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of
obviousness, the examiner relies upon Hishida in view of Schuh.
Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner
relies upon Hishida in view of Schuh, further in view of Tanaka.
Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner
relies upon Hishida in view of Schuh, further in view of Hoyer-Ellefsen.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007