Ex parte WOODS et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1998-0818                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/319,143                                                                                                             


                                   for providing said amplitude encoded filter at                                                                       
                                   said Fourier transform plane to produce an                                                                           
                                   intermediate signal at the Fourier transform                                                                         
                                   plane; and                                                                                                           
                                            (d) means for Fourier transforming said                                                                     
                                   intermediate signal in order to recover the                                                                          
                                   optical image having a substantially reduced                                                                         
                                   degree of distortion.                                                                                                
                          The Examiner relies upon the following reference:                                                                             
                 Chen et al. (Chen)                           5,426,521                                             Jun. 20,                            
                 1995                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         (filed Dec. 22, 1992)                                          
                          Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                                                                       
                 anticipated by Chen et al.                                                                                                             
                          Claims 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12 and 14 stand rejected under                                                                         
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al.                                                                                 
                          Rather then reiterate the arguments of the Appellants and                                                                     
                 the Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs  and Answers  for                  1                     2                               
                 the respective details thereof.                                                                                                        



                          1Appellants filed an Appeal Brief on September 8, 1997.                                                                       
                 On December 22, 1997 Appellants filed a Reply Brief.  On                                                                               
                 January 13, 1998, the Examiner mailed a communication stating                                                                          
                 that the reply brief had been considered and entered.                                                                                  
                          2The Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer on November 25,                                                                     
                 1997.  On April 14, 2000 the Examiner mailed a Supplemental                                                                            
                 Examiner’s Answer in response to a Remand from the Board of                                                                            
                 Appeals and Interferences.                                                                                                             
                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007