Appeal No. 1998-0884 Page 4
Application No. 08/084,642
Krause et al. (Krause) 5,091,782 Feb. 25,
1992.
Claims 2, 8, 32, 43, 56, and 58 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Krause. Rather than repeat
the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer
the reader to the briefs and answers for the respective
details thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejection advanced by
the examiner. Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments
and evidence of the appellants and examiner. After
considering the totality of the record, we are persuaded that
the examiner erred in rejecting claims 2, 8, 32, 43, 56, and
58. Accordingly, we reverse.
We begin by noting the following principles from Rowe v.
Dror, 112 F.3d 473, 478, 42 USPQ2d 1550, 1553 (Fed. Cir.
1997).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007