Appeal No. 1998-0889
Application 08/006,585
The limitations of claims 43-45 have been discussed in
connection with claims 1, 3, 4, and 8. Because independent claim 43
does not contain the limitations of independent claim 1 on which the
rejection was reversed, it does not stand or fall together with
claim 1 as argued by Appellant (Br23). The separate patentability of
claim 46 has not been argued. The rejection of claims 43-46 is
sustained.
- 18 -
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007