THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOSHIO SUZUKI ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0892 Application No. 08/509,795 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 8-14. Claims 1-7 have been cancelled, and claims 15-16 have been allowed. An amendment after final rejection was filed on November 2, 1996 and was entered by the examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007