Ex parte TAGUCHI et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication is not binding precedent of the                 
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       

           Ex parte HIROMICHI TAGUCHI, KENICHIRO TAKAYANAGI                           
          and MITSUHIRO KAWASE                                                        
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0907                                  
                               Application 08/121,365                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and HECKER, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 7 and 8, all claims pending in this application.                     
               Appellants’ invention relates to a cathode ray tube which              


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007