Ex parte FUKUSHIMA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0988                                        Page 4           
          Application No. 08/268,861                                                   



               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art                
          reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of                    
          inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention as                  
          well as disclosing structure which is capable of performing the              
          recited functional limitations.  RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital                
          Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed.                
          Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore and                  
          Assoc. Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ                  
          303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984).                


               At pages 4-5 of the answer, the examiner applies Stefansky              
          to the elements of claim 1 and, up until the portion of claim 1              
          reciting “an actuator unlocking apparatus including:,” we agree              
          with the examiner’s analysis.  Claim 1 requires that the                     
          actuator unlocking apparatus include the supply of a                         
          predetermined drive current and a second predetermined drive                 
          current such that the currents are in opposite directions and                
          the second drive current is selected to stop motion caused by                
          the first drive current so that the actuator is stopped within               
          the data zone of the disk storage medium.                                    








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007