Appeal No. 1998-0988 Page 6
Application No. 08/268,861
Thus, without resorting to speculation, we cannot say that
each and every element of claim 1 is disclosed by Stefansky.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 1 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
We now turn to the rejection of claims 3 through 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007