Ex parte AVITALL - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 19              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Ex parte BOAZ AVITALL                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-1045                                  
                                Application 08/482,674                                
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 38 through 46, which are all of the claims              
          in the application.1                                                        


               1Independent claim 38 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.   
          See Paper No. 9.                                                            
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007