Ex parte OOMEN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1060                                                        
          Application No. 08/433,664                                                  


               The invention relates to a method of manufacturing a                   
          filtering layer on the faceplate of a display device such as a              
          cathode ray tube.  In particular, the filtering layer contains              
          silicon dioxide, a metal oxide, and a dye.                                  
               The sole independent claim 5 is reproduced as follows:                 
               5.  A method of manufacturing a filtering layer of                     
          silicon on a display screen of a display device, characterized              
          in that the filtering layer is manufactured by providing, on                
          the display screen, a coating of a mixture of an alcoholic                  
          solution of an alkoxysilane compound, an alkoxy compound of at              
          least one metal selected from the group consisting of Ge, Zr,               
          Al and Ti, acidified water and a black dye and then heating                 
          said thus coated display screen to a temperature sufficient to              
          form silicon dioxide from the alkoxysilane compound and to                  
          form an oxide of said metal from said alkoxy compound thereby               
          forming the filtering layer comprising silicon dioxide, an                  
          oxide of the metal and the dye.                                             
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Kato et al. (Kato)            4,787,716      Nov. 29, 1988                  
          Kawamura et al. (Kawamura)    5,291,097      Mar.  1, 1994                  
                                                  (filed May 1, 1991)                 
          Kojima et al. (Kojima)        EP 517,611     Dec.  9, 1992                  
          Appellants’ Admitted Prior Art(APA)(pg. 1, line 20-pg. 2, line              
          2)                                                                          
          2) Claims 5 through 8 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 

          § 103 as being unpatentable over either APA or Kojima in view               
          of Kawamura and further in view of Kato.                                    



                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007