Appeal No. 1998-1078 Page 11 Application No. 08/442,532 Because the examiner fails to show a relationship between the torque ripple of a brushless motor and the motor's trigger point, we are not persuaded that the prior art would have suggested that "relative positions of said stator core, said driving magnet pole portion, said FG magnetized portion, and said FG pattern in a circumferential direction are set so that a minimum point of a torque ripple of said brushless motor always occurs at a different time than a point of an output signal from said FG pattern, said point of said output signal functioning as a trigger for rotation control" or that the "relative positions ... are set so that a maximum point of a torque ripple of said brushless motor always occurs at the same time as, a point of an output signal from said FG pattern, said point of said output signal functioning as a trigger for rotation control." Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-4 as obvious over AAPA in view of Imai.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007