Ex parte KOBAYASHI et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-1083                                                        
          Application 08/402,606                                                      

          determine a second path and then determine a displacement                   
          between the first and second paths.                                         
               Engelberger is a real time process that senses dynamic                 
          feedback information from accelerometers 104 and 106 and                    
          tachometers 82, 84, and 86 and selectively combines it with                 
          the positional error signal to stabilize the positional                     
          servo loop (col. 7, lines 19-33).  Therefore, Engelberger                   
          also does not determine a second path and then determine a                  
          displacement between the first and second paths.                            
               Because the applied references do not determine a                      
          second path and then determine a displacement between the                   
          first and second paths, we conclude that the Examiner has                   
          failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with                  
          respect to claim 5.  The rejections of claim 5 over Ishiguro                
          and Furukawa and Ishiguro and Engelberger are reversed.                     
                                    CONCLUSION                                        
               The rejections of claims 1-5 are reversed.                             
                                     REVERSED                                         






                                       - 12 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007