Ex parte OKAJIMA - Page 2





          Appeal No. 1998-1112                                                        
          Application No. 07/871,768                                                  


                    a CPU for controlling the execution of the transfer               
               program,                                                               
                    a bus operated under control of the CPU for carrying the          
               data stored in the RAM to the external device;                         
                    a reset switch for initializing a system area in the              
               RAM,  wherein the CPU controls a detection process to detect a         
               state of a prescribed terminal portion of the portable device          
               when the reset switch is turned on and also determines                 
               whether or not the transfer program is to be executed based            
               on the detected state, and                                             
                    wherein execution of the transfer program by the CPU              
               causes data stored in the RAM to be applied via the bus to             
               the external device.                                                   

          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Engstrom et al. (Engstrom)        4,984,295        Jan. 08, 1991            
          Kelly                             5,065,360        Nov. 12, 1991            
                                                                                     
          The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over Engstrom in view of Kelly.                          
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellant                  
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           
          the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 33) and supplemental examiner’s            
          answers (Paper Nos. 36 and 38) and the appellant’s brief (Paper             
          No. 32), reply brief (Paper No. 35) and supplemental reply brief            
          (Paper No. 37).                                                             
          Appellant’s Invention                                                       

                                            2                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007