Appeal No. 1998-1112
Application No. 07/871,768
art would not have combined Kelly with Engstrom to allow for the
editing and checking for the correctness of Engstrom’s program or
data prior to
transferring it through a programming port to another computer
because Engstrom does not teach such a transfer2.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ JR.
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES D. THOMAS ) APPEAL AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
2 We note that the examiner has made no attempt to utilize Kelly
as the main reference and Engstrom as the secondary reference to
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007