Appeal No. 1998-1320
Application No. 08/305,643
For the reasons discussed supra, it is our opinion that,
since the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of
obviousness, the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent
claims 1, 7, and 13, as well as claims 2-6, 8-12, and 14-18
dependent thereon, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-18 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007