Ex parte CHANG et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1998-1408                                                                                     Page 4                        
                 Application No. 08/569,529                                                                                                             


                                   a top and sides of said core, said conductors of                                                                     
                                   said flex circuit being surface bonded to                                                                            
                                   respective conductors of said printed circuit                                                                        
                                   board to form a series of windings around said                                                                       
                                   core.                                                                                                                

                          The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:                                                                      
                 Layton et al. (Layton)                       4,308,513                           Dec. 29, 1981                                         
                 Dirks                                        4,975,671                           Dec.  4, 1990                                         


                 Sato                         2-107051                                                                        Jan. 16, 1990.                                        
                 (Japanese Patent Publication)                                                                                                          


                          Claims 1-7 and 15-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                           
                 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sato in view of Layton and                                                                         
                 Dirks.  Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellants or                                                                          
                 examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the brief and answer                                                                          
                 for the respective details thereof.                                                                                                    


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            



                          1A copy of the translation prepared by the U.S. Patent and                                                                    
                 Trademark Office is included and relied upon for this                                                                                  
                 decision.  We will refer to the translation by page number in                                                                          
                 this opinion.                                                                                                                          







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007