THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILLIAM C. PFEFFERLE ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1493 Application No. 08/377,861 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1-10, which constitute all of the claims of record in the application. The appellant's invention is directed to an emissions control system for a rich-burn, small internal combustionPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007