Appeal No. 1998-1493 Application No. 08/377,861 The appellant's independent claim 1 requires that there be means within the reaction chamber for inducing effective recirculation of the exhaust flowing through said reaction chamber, and creating a low pressure region in the reaction chamber proximal the chamber inlet (emphasis added). In the Samejima apparatus, a point "proximal the chamber inlet" would be located at or near the outlet of pipe 6, immediately above catalyst chamber 9. If a means for inducing effective recirculation and for creating a low pressure area were to be placed there, it seems to us that the Samejima invention would be rendered inoperable, for the required flow of at least some of the exhaust gas into the catalyst chamber, which is vital to the operation of the Samejima system, would be at the very least severely compromised, and perhaps even destroyed. This, from our perspective, would be a disincentive to the artisan to make the modification proposed by the examiner. Moreover, even if the proposed modification were made, the resulting structure would not meet the terms of claim 1. The Aronsohn turbulator would appear to meet the first "means" requirement of inducing effective recirculation of the 13Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007