The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANDRE’ SEZNEC ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1506 Application No. 08/302,695 ____________ HEARD: November 14, 2000 ____________ Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 5, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellant's invention relates to a cache memory device. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. An improved cache memory device for use in a data processing system which includes an addressable main memory (MP); at least one request input/output (ESRQ) for receiving a request (REQ) for access to a data item stored in thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007