Ex parte FUNK et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law               
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                

                                                                                             Paper No. 11                            

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          


                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               


              Ex parte MARK R. FUNK, STEVEN R. KUNKEL, MIKKO H. LIPASTI,                                                             
               BILHA MENDELSON, ROBERT R. ROEDIGER and WILLIAM J. SCHMIDT                                                            


                                                      Appeal No. 1998-1516                                                           
                                                      Application 08/420,540                                                         

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 

               Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              

               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   

                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 20, all of the              


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007