Ex parte SMIT et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1539                                                        
          Application No. 08/683,186                                                  

               The invention pertains to x-ray tubes.  More                           
          particularly, a thermally conductive metal cooling layer is                 
          provided for enhancing the dissipation of heat at the anode.                
               Independent claim 5 is reproduced as follows:                          
               5. An X-ray tube, comprising:                                          
               a tube wall,                                                           
               an anode having a transmissive target layer for                        
          generating X-rays in response to the impingement of an                      
          electron beam;                                                              
               a cathode having a loop-shaped electron emissive element               
          for generating an electron beam, the beam forming a                         
          substantially annular anode target ring on the transmissive                 
          target,                                                                     
               an X-ray exit window, adjacent the target layer, and                   
               a thermally conductive metal cooling layer disposed with               
          a surface against the transmissive target, the metal cooling                
          layer being disposed substantially within the annular electron              
          target ring, so as not to substantially block the electron                  
          beam, which metal cooling layer is thermally conductively                   
          connected to the tube wall, which metal cooling layer acts as               
          a means for enhancing the dissipation of heat at least for the              
          anode.                                                                      
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Jenkins             4,731,804                Mar. 15, 1988                  
          Valkonet            4,969,173                Nov.  6, 1990                  
               Claims 5, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over Valkonet in view of Jenkins.                              


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007