THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARTIN V. SCHNEIDER and CUONG TRAN
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-1545
Application No. 08/698,169
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13, 20-30 and 39-
41. Claims 14-19, 31-38, 44 and 45 have been canceled. Claim 42 has been indicated
as allowable. While claim 43 still appears to be pending in the application, neither the
examiner nor appellant mentions it in either the answer or the brief,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007