Ex parte SCHNEIDER et al. - Page 7




              Appeal No. 1998-1545                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/698,169                                                                                


              Accordingly, we see no way that the device of McGirr would be modified by any teaching of                 
              Takeuchi so as to result in the instant claimed subject matter, within the meaning of 35                  
              U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                             
                     Neither Smith nor Fray, applied for features introduced by dependent claims,                       
              remedies the deficiencies of McGirr and Takeuchi.                                                         
                     Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-13, 20-30 and 39-41 under               
              35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                          
                     The examiner's decision is reversed.                                                               
                                                     REVERSED                                                           




                            KENNETH W. HAIRSTON                )                                                        
                            Administrative Patent Judge               )                                                 
                                                                      )                                                 
                                                                      )                                                 
                                                                      )   BOARD OF PATENT                               
                            ERROL A. KRASS                     )     APPEALS AND                                        
                            Administrative Patent Judge               )    INTERFERENCES                                
                                                                      )                                                 
                                                                      )                                                 
                                                                      )                                                 
                            PARSHOTAM S. LALL                  )                                                        
                            Administrative Patent Judge               )                                                 





                                                           7                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007