Ex parte RUIZ et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1547                                                        
          Application No. 08/582,001                                                  

               The invention is directed to a head suspension assembly                
          in a disk drive for supporting and positioning electromagnetic              
          heads for transduction with one or more recording disks                     
          mounted on a rotatable spindle.                                             
               Independent claim 1 is representative of the invention                 
          and is reproduced as follows:                                               
               1. A suspension assembly for supporting a transducer in a              
          disk drive comprising:                                                      
               a suspension member with a multilayer laminate stock                   
          having a mount plate area defined therein,                                  
               said mount plate area comprising:                                      
                    a plurality of metal layers clad to one another, and              
                    at least one etch retardant layer received between a              
               first pair of said plurality of metal layers; and                      
                    said etch retardant layer is a metal selected from                
          the       group consisting of gold, tungsten, and nickel.                   
               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Erpelding et al. [Erpelding]            4,996,623           Feb.            
          26, 1991                                                                    
               Claims 1-6 and 21-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          112, second paragraph.  Claims 1-6 and 21-26 stand further                  
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Erpelding.              
               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007