Ex parte WEINER et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1577                                                        
          Application No. 08/593,766                                                  


          doped regions in the silicon member, and thereafter a number                
          of laser pulses having an energy level lower than the single                
          pulse is directed onto selected regions of the silicon member               
          to produce heavily doped regions in the silicon member.                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A process for fabricating a LDD source drain,                      
               particularly adapted for MOS transistors, including:                   
               providing a dopant atmosphere about a silicon member;                  
               directing a single pulse of laser energy onto                          
          selected       regions of the silicon member to produce lightly             
          doped     regions in the silicon member; and                                
               directing a number of laser pulses having energy                       
          lower     than the single pulse onto selected regions of the                
          silicon member to produce heavily doped regions in the                      
          silicon member.                                                             
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Ishida et al. (Ishida)        5,316,969                May 31,              
          1994                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                   
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Ishida.                                   
               Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                  
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007