The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOSHIYASU HATTORI and MASATERU WATANABE ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1655 Application No. 08/367,766 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-4 and 8-29. We affirm-in-part. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to optical disk drives. In an optical disk drive, an optical disk serving as a recording medium is encased in a cartridge toPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007