Ex parte HATTORI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1655                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/367,766                                                  


               cartridge so as to apply a pressing force to the                       
               second main surface of said cartridge;                                 
                         driving means for rotating said disc type                    
               medium in said cartridge while said biasing means                      
               applies the pressing force to the second main                          
               surface;                                                               
                         wherein said biasing means applies the                       
               pressing force to hold and press together said first                   
               and second main surfaces relative to each other due                    
               to said pressing force;                                                
               and head means movable in the radial direction of said                 
          disc type medium for recording/reproducing information on/from              
          said disc type medium while said disc type medium is rotated                
          by said driving means.                                                      


               The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:               


               Takahara et al. (Takahara)    4,439,850           Mar. 27,             
          1984                                                                        
               Yamada et al. (Yamada)        4,839,760           June 13,             
               1989.                                                                  



               Claims 1-4, 8-11, 20, 21, and 23 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by or under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as obvious over Yamada.  Claims 12-16, 22, and 24-29 stand                  
          rejected under § 103 as obvious over Yamada.  Claims 17-19                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007