Ex parte BERGE et al. - Page 19




               Appeal No. 1998-1711                                                                         Page 19                 
               Application No. 08/506,387                                                                                           






                       37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM                                  
               THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect                                
               to the new grounds of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c)) as to                        
               the rejected claims:                                                                                                 
                               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or a                                   
                       showing of facts relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                            
                       reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the application will be remanded                                
                       to the examiner. . . .                                                                                       
                               (2) Request that the application be reheard under § 1.197(b) by the Board                            
                       of Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the same record. . . .                                              
                       Should the appellants elect to prosecute further before the Primary Examiner pursuant to                     
               37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141                           
               or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the effective date of the affirmance is deferred                      
               until conclusion of the prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited                    
               prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                                                                     
                       If the appellants elect prosecution before the examiner and this does not result in                          
               allowance of the application, abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned to                        
               the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for final action on the affirmed rejection,                            
               including any timely request for rehearing thereof.                                                                  









Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007