Appeal No. 1998-1716 Page 2
Application No. 08/526,942
The appellant's invention relates to a noise abatement
wall (specification, p. 1). A substantially correct copy of
the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the
appellant's brief. 1
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Atterbury 828,833 Aug.
14, 1906
Wolfe 1,389,803 Sept. 6,
1921
Ham 1,598,131 Aug. 31,
1926
Stout 3,307,822 March 7,
1967
Williams 3,584,088 June 8,
1971
Vaughan 3,743,232 July 3,
1973
Scholz et al. 3,954,377 May 4,
1976
(Scholz)
Myers et al. 5,202,132 Apr. 13,
1993
(Myers)
Bryant 5,246,640 Sep. 21,
1993
1A minor error in claim 26 is set forth on page 3 of the
examiner's answer.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007