Ex parte KEENAN - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-1716                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/526,942                                                  


          claimed invention from the isolated teachings of the prior                  
          art.  See, e.g., Grain Processing Corp. v. American                         
          Maize-Products Co., 840 F.2d 902, 907, 5 USPQ2d 1788, 1792                  
          (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                                           


               With this as background, we analyze the prior art applied              
          by the examiner in the rejection of the claims on appeal.                   


               Myers discloses production line equipment which is                     
          utilized in producing many large concrete panels, in an                     
          initial horizontal position with these panels preferably being              
          later installed vertically with other like panels to form a                 
          sound barrier alongside a vehicle way.  As shown in Figure 3-               
          6, the preferred concrete panel 42 has integral pilasters 126,              
          128 formed at each side of an integral central planar body                  
          130.  The community view side 160 of the concrete panel 42 is               
          illustrated in Figure 3.  The vehicle way view side 162 of the              
          concrete panel 42 is shown in Figure 4.  A tongue edge 164 and              
          a groove edge 166 of each concrete panel 42 is observable in                
          Figures 5 and 6.  As shown in                                               









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007