Ex parte SORENSEN et al. - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                               Paper No. 21           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                           Ex parte SOREN C. SORENSEN and                             
                                  JENS O. SORENSEN                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-1821                                  
                             Application No. 08/584,606                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                    
          refusal to allow claims 1 through 14 which are all of the                   
          claims pending in the application.                                          
               The claimed subject matter is directed to a process for                
          injection molding a cable tie.  Claim 1 is representative of                
          the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007